This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

QB1

Ever since the Xbox One and PS4 launched in 2022, it'south been clear that both consoles have problems maintaining a steady 30 FPS at 1920×1080 (1080p). Microsoft's Xbox Ane has particular trouble with these settings and oftentimes runs at a lower resolution than its PS4 equivalent. Breakthrough Break was supposed to break this trend. The game was adult by Remedy Entertainment, the aforementioned studio behind Max Payne 1 & 2 and the critically acclaimed Alan Wake. Terminal twelvemonth, Remedy went out of its way to land that Quantum Break on the Xbox Ane would run at 1080p native resolution, with some effects rendered at a lower resolution to maintain a steady thirty FPS.

Contained testing by Eurogamer suggests this isn't what actually happened. The company spent hours with what appears to be the final game code. Eurogamer writes:

Curiously, the [SIGGRAPH 2022] paper likewise states Xbox I's final output is 1920×1080, and that's where there is some confusion — as we've notwithstanding to run into evidence of total Hd 1080p gameplay in close analysis — barring the title'southward HUD elements and menus. In every scene tested so far, a native resolution of 720p is the consistent result institute in each pixel count test — and then while there's every possibility of individual render targets operating at college resolutions, basic geometry that nosotros're able to measure easily in a 720p issue equally things stand up.

At that place are two versions of the SIGGRAPH paper in question — the smaller annotated version is bachelor hither, while the full version with embedded images is here.

quantum_break-2

Quantum Break is visually stunning in many respects.

According to Eurogamer, Breakthrough Pause on the Xbox Ane is oftentimes visually stunning, with smart utilize of materials, lighting effects, and antialiasing. The game makes some employ of dynamic resolution scaling to arrange GPU load depending on what'due south happening on-screen, just Quantum Intermission pushes the envelope of what the Xbox One can handle in terms of outdoor environments. Over again, here's Eurogamer: "More than open locations combined with continued use of advanced effects work can impact performance to a sure extent. Violent and frame-rate drops consequence in judder and reduced controller response here, with this having a knock-on effect to gameplay. Performance suffers only as we have aim at surrounding enemies, and the variable levels of latency and visible stutter make it harder to take accurate shots. Once the engine catches its breath and frame rates stabilize these issues are fully resolved."

The shadows in Quantum Break are low resolution and tend to dither when you move. Image by Eurogamer

The shadows in Quantum Break are low resolution and tend to dither when you movement. Epitome past Eurogamer

Eurogamer writes that the PC version of the game is also locked to 1080p and 30 FPS, though they say the game notwithstanding "required plenty of work before launch." Since Quantum Break is a Universal Windows Platform (UWP) application only available through the Windows Store, it's only not articulate if information technology will transcend the current barriers to that platform or end upwards duplicating Gears of State of war's terrible launch.

Triumphant achievement or symptoms of a larger struggle?

Digital Foundry goes out of its way to praise Quantum Break's visual design and notes that many of the problems they encountered were isolated to specific areas of the game. Nonetheless, the news that the title's final output is in 720p (and a soft 720p at that) volition disappoint some fans. Writing for Forbes, Jason Evangelho excoriated the 720p / xxx FPS target, writing:

"Near l games on the original Xbox ran at 720p. 15 years later, one of Microsoft'due south flagship titles on the Xbox 1 arrangement is likewise running at 720p… I realize that doesn't paint a complete motion picture. I realize that the graphics we're being treated to are light years alee of past console generations. I realize that Quantum Suspension actually appears to exist a beautiful game… I would exist perfectly content with a 720p/60fps presentation. But one that struggles to maintain 30fps 100% percentage of the time and is detrimental to gameplay? That's an issue if true, and information technology's non something console players should be dealing with in 2022."

Ane of the mutual complaints this generation has been that it doesn't really feel similar a full generational upgrade. Games await better than they used to, certainly, but non to the degree you might expect given the 8-twelvemonth gap between the Xbox 360 and the Xbox One (or PS3 vs. PS4). Much of this is explained past price. The PlayStation 3 launched at $499 and $599 ($597 and $693 in 2022 dollars), while the Xbox 360 debuted at $300 (no hard drive) and $400 (20GB). That comes out to $357 and $477 in 2022 dollars, but retrieve — the original Xbox 360 didn't transport with Kinect. That's significant, because Microsoft later revealed information technology had spent a substantial clamper of the Xbox 1's original development costs on Kinect 2, and the hardware packages from both companies were meant to make them profitable on console says from Day 1, rather than taking a bath on sales from twenty-four hours 1 and hoping to brand it up in software license fees.

The fact that both the Xbox 1 and PS4 have sold briskly to-engagement suggests that plenty of gamers are willing to tolerate sub-30 FPS frame rates and 720-900p presentations. I've got no particular bone to pick with that, and any objective comparison of last-gen to electric current titles illustrates that the detail levels and overall visual effects take improved, fifty-fifty if the proceeds is smaller than in previous generations. At the same fourth dimension, however, Forbes has a point. Resolution isn't everything, only it'due south certainly something, and the fact that developers tin't manage to offer fifty-fifty 60 FPS at a resolution that went mainstream 10 years ago speaks volumes most how both Microsoft and game developers take set up their priorities.

There are rumors of major refreshes coming for both consoles, but information technology'southward non clear that either Sony or Microsoft wants to apply those refreshes to meliorate bones presentation. Sony is talking well-nigh 4K capabilities, but fifty-fifty an enormous GPU upgrade at the 14nm node wouldn't fit a 4K / sixty FPS GPU into the $lxxx – $120 BOM cost of the APU itself. Honestly, I think even 4K at 30 FPS would be a stretch, and I'd rather encounter a 1080p / 60 FPS target, provided that Sony and MS made constant 60 FPS presentation mandatory.

Microsoft'southward Phil Spencer clarified his comments on an upgradeable Xbox One to specify that the console wouldn't be upgraded in-place, but left open up what nosotros remember is the more likely scenario — an entirely new Xbox One console with full backwards compatibility and upgraded performance. Sony's rumored PS4.v or PS4K appears to envision a similar scenario. The just fashion gamers would accept this kind of strategy, nonetheless, is if they feel like the new, mid-wheel panel offers compelling performance updates and capabilities that the previous version lacked — enough to make it worth dropping $400-$500 on a new platform.